The chart below shows the number of men and women in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying fulltime or part-time. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar graphs illustrate the proportion of full-time and part-time education of males and females in three different times 1970-71,1980-81,1990-91 in Britain.
Overall, it can be observed that the number of men studying part-time has increased over the years whereas women studying in both full-time and half-time has increased.
Firstly, it has been observed that there are more males studying full-time in 1990 with around 1000 people where in part-time it was only 100. In contrast, the figures for full-time education declined to almost 820 and there has been a slight growth in part-time education by 50 which it saw a steady increase to 820 and 200 in 1990-91 in full-time and part-time education.
On the other hand, there are very few numbers of females pursuing education in 1970 when compared to males which stood at 700 and around 20 in full-time and part-time but as time passes these figures started increased significantly every year. Subsequently, next year numbers increased by 100 and 150 compared to the past year and marked highest at the end of the period which is at 1100 and 200 in the year 1990.
- The graph below shows radio and television audiences throughout the day in 1992 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 11
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The illustrations show how chocolate is produced Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 56
- Many animal species in the world are becoming extinct nowadays Some people say that countries and individuals should protect these animals from dying out while others say that we should concentrate more on problems human beings Discuss both sides and give 84
- The chart below shows the number of men and women in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying fulltime or part time Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relev 78
- The following diagram shows a typical process followed in cheese making 88
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 302, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'compared' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'compares'.
Suggestion: compares
...t year numbers increased by 100 and 150 compared to the past year and marked highest at ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, whereas, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 941.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00531914894 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93761046237 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558510638298 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 37.5473774791 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.833333333 112.824112599 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.3333333333 22.9334400587 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6666666667 5.23603664747 204% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204597134613 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124381755215 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495901448819 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149923605297 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0386174438337 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.2329268293 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.37 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 302, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'compared' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'compares'.
Suggestion: compares
...t year numbers increased by 100 and 150 compared to the past year and marked highest at ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, whereas, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 941.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00531914894 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93761046237 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558510638298 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 37.5473774791 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.833333333 112.824112599 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.3333333333 22.9334400587 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6666666667 5.23603664747 204% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204597134613 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124381755215 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495901448819 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149923605297 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0386174438337 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.2329268293 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.37 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.