The chart below shows the number of men and women in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying fulltime or part-time.
The change in the number of males and females taking either full-time and part-time further education in the UK from 1970 to 1991 is displayed in the bar chart, shown in percentage.
Overall, the vast majority of British were more likely to choose full-time education in both men and women than the counterpart. Furthermore, the number of male and female students increased considerably, except males studying full-time.
Initially, there were a million of men choosing full-time education, being higher than more or less 800,000 women taking this. However, only the minority of both sexes was less excited to be part-time students, with the number at below a hundred thousand.
Eventually, although the figure for men who received full-time higher education were observed to decrease to around 850,000 in 1980/81, it recovered to be about 950,000. Meanwhile, an interest was seen on women, with the number of them inclining sustainably to exceed that of men in the initial year. Simultaneously, both females and males registered to study part-time were seen to increase, but those were approximately 200,000 students, respectively.
- Information technology is changing many aspect of our lives and now dominates our home leisure and work activities To what extent do the benefits of information technology outweigh the disadvantages 84
- The pie charts below show the coffee production coffee consumption and the profit distribution around the world 89
- The pie charts below show the data regarding the time people spend on smartphones and tablets divided by category 89
- Some people think that it is more e ective for students to study in a group while others believe that it is better for them to study alone Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- Some people think that government is responsible for the rise in obesity in children Do you agree or disagree 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, while, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 962.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40449438202 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93411213374 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612359550562 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.1124966198 43.030603864 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 120.25 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30559570379 0.215688989381 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138172309768 0.103423049105 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0370724753492 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196485822269 0.15604864568 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0138386229669 0.0819641961636 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, while, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 962.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40449438202 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93411213374 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612359550562 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.1124966198 43.030603864 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 120.25 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30559570379 0.215688989381 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138172309768 0.103423049105 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0370724753492 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196485822269 0.15604864568 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0138386229669 0.0819641961636 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.