The chart below shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart gives information about how many people visited New York City through three major airports, over a six-year period between 1995 and 2000.
Overall, there was a fluctuation in the number of passengers who traveled via. John F. Kennedy airport, while the other two airports saws an upward trend. Another interesting point is that LaGuardia airport was the most popular at the end.
According to the graph, the number of travelers at John F. Kennedy airport started at 26 millions in 1995, and then increased remarkably to reach the highest point of 47 millions in 1997. In 1999, the figure dipped to 32 millions. At the last year, there was a slight growth to 44 millions. On the other hand, LaGuardia began at 35 millions in 1995, after that it rose remarkably for the next three years, at 46 millions. In 2000, LaGuardia hit the peak point at 68 millions travelers.
However, if we look at Newark airport, it started at the lowest point of 16 millions passengers in the first year. After this point, the trend increased significantly to 42 millions in 1998. In the last two years it remained stable at 42 millions travelers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-02 | faraj27 | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-12 | Dang Thi Truc Linh | 56 | view |
| 2019-09-12 | Milan karki | 56 | view |
| 2019-09-12 | Milan karki | 56 | view |
| 2019-03-10 | upeksss | 78 | view |
- The diagram below shows the production of electricity using a system called Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (OTEC).Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below. 73
- The government should control the internet to reduce cyber crime and ensure safety of users To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 82
- The line graph below shows the changes in the share price of Outokumpu companies in euros between January 2006 and December 2010 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below 63
- The graph below shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany, France, Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below. 73
- The two pie charts below show some employment patterns in Great Britain in 1992 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Employees and self employed by sex and occupation 1992 81
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 950.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79797979798 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56663069076 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59595959596 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.2229904818 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.0769230769 112.824112599 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2307692308 22.9334400587 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.30769230769 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142194973015 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0494092631111 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.067103688004 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111015403091 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0939147527831 0.0819641961636 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.63 61.2550243902 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.97 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.01 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.