The chart below shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000.
The bar graph elucidates the number of travelers at three distinguish airports, namely; John F. Kennedy, LaGuardia and Newark, in New York City from 1995 to 2000. While John F. Kennedy experienced a periodic fluctuation in the number of airport travelers, LaGuardia showed a continuously increasing trend to be the dominant airport and Newark also experienced an upward trend.
To start with, the passengers used John F. Kennedy airport had the highest passengers in 1997 and 2000 of close to 50 million passengers for both years, despite the periodic fluctuations. Concurrently, other two airports experienced upward trends throughout 5 years. LaGuardia had grown its usage substantially from around 35 million passengers in 1995 to reach at its peak of nearly 70 million passengers in 2000 to dominant its travelers in German. Whereas Newark slowly grew to over 40 million passengers by 1998 from 15 million passengers in the beginning, and which number of passengers remained unchanged until 2000.
- The table shows the sales figures of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and banana in five countries,namely,U.K,Switzerland,Denmark, Belgium and Sweden in the years 1999 and 2004. 73
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibilities of governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves? 67
- Levels of youth crime are increasing rapidly in most cities around the world. What are the reasons for this, and suggest some solutions. 56
- As well as making money businesses also have social responsibilities To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Even though globalization affects the world’s economies in a very positive way, its negative side should not be forgotten. Discuss. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 378, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ewark also experienced an upward trend. To start with, the passengers used John ...
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'so', 'whereas', 'while', 'to start with']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.294797687861 0.268076937826 110% => OK
Verbs: 0.0924855491329 0.116061578633 80% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0578034682081 0.0759168565197 76% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0404624277457 0.0366838410393 110% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0173410404624 0.0131127313244 132% => OK
Prepositions: 0.150289017341 0.155750635184 96% => OK
Participles: 0.0115606936416 0.0379272487307 30% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 3.00093453371 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0404624277457 0.0210936926555 192% => Less infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0693641618497 0.0948980150116 73% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.00437022459523 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00578034682081 0.00967000014798 60% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1005.0 1161.00487805 87% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.9 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.36075949367 5.90752243213 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73763899035 95% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.424050632911 0.337110787985 126% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.329113924051 0.247514529752 133% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.227848101266 0.171178102325 133% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.183544303797 0.112407865282 163% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00093453371 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588607594937 0.546246751206 108% => OK
Word variations: 50.8479497018 49.3433353143 103% => OK
How many sentences: 6.0 8.93414634146 67% => OK
Sentence length: 26.3333333333 23.0094962315 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3533417283 42.9750493124 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 167.5 135.714022679 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3333333333 23.0094962315 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.833333333333 0.689975730869 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.84146341463 52% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.48048780488 68% => OK
Readability: 59.2447257384 47.7609492067 124% => OK
Elegance: 3.03846153846 2.94281807926 103% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313109794172 0.418131533498 75% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.168840660115 0.181151798455 93% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.119079620407 0.0850326197045 140% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.636440926379 0.706616315825 90% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.220334855118 0.157042692854 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.181415068121 0.228904883108 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125233193858 0.108899403657 115% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.345925118501 0.367819155151 94% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0 0.0812612215331 0% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.278450834426 0.316326947829 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.076479956855 0.0921553760075 83% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70731707317 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.14146341463 0% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.08536585366 49% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 3.16585365854 126% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 0.956097560976 0% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.02926829268 66% => OK
Total topic words: 6.0 7.1512195122 84% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.