The chart below shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart compares how many travelers used three key airports in New York City over a period of 6 years.
It is clear that there were growing numbers of visitors of Newark and LaGuardia airports over the period shown. By contrast, the number of people using John F. Kennedy varied significantly.
In 1995, the number of people using LaGuardia was highest, with 35 million passengers. The figure for John F. Kennedy was 26 million, compared to only 15 million visitors who used Newark airport. 1997 saw significant rises in the number of passengers using John F. Kennedy, LaGuardia and Newark, with 46 million, 42 million and 38 million respectively.
From 1998 to 2000, there was no change for the number of people using Newark while that of LaGuardia continued to rise considerably and reached a peak at 68 million. However, the figure for John F. Kennedy dropped dramatically to 32 million in 1999 before experiencing a remarkable increase to 44 million in 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-02 | faraj27 | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-12 | Dang Thi Truc Linh | 56 | view |
| 2019-09-12 | Milan karki | 56 | view |
| 2019-09-12 | Milan karki | 56 | view |
| 2019-03-10 | upeksss | 78 | view |
- The table below shows statistics about the top five countries for international tourism in2012 and 2013. 78
- One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 84
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their levels of health and fitness aredecreasing.What do you think are the causes of these problems and what measures could be taken to solve them? 73
- The graph below shows female unemployment rates in each country of the United Kingdom in 2013 and 2014.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The bar chart below shows shares of expenditures for five major categories in the United States Canada the United Kingdom and Japan in the year 2009 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 810.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93902439024 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74086552807 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.591463414634 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.7236622453 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 67.5 112.824112599 60% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.6666666667 22.9334400587 60% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 1.5 5.23603664747 29% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156462135787 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0629332226961 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0690553920595 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123547376347 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0765572165676 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 13.2329268293 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.2 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.78 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 4.5 11.4329268293 39% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.