The chart below shows the numbers of three types of visitors to a museum between 1997 and 2012. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart depicts variation in three genres of visitors to a museum, in four periods, from 1997 to 2012.
At first glance, it becomes clear that the majority of tourists were adults throughout the periods. In addition, the number of juveniles tend to decrease over the periods, the reverse was true for special exhibition visitors. Overall, although the number of three types of tourists had changed over the periods, there had been no change in the rankings of all three being seen in the latter, the highest being adult visitor and the lowest being special exhibition visitors.
In more detail, adult visitors numbered around 300100 in 1997, twofold to the figure for children and tenfold to special exhibition visitors. Over 5 years, the figure for adult visitors and special exhibition visitors increased slightly, ranging from 1000 to 2000 visitors. In comparison, the number of juveniles experienced a significant decrease by 10000 visitors.
In 2007, the number of adult visitors hit the highest point at 400.500 visitors, and this figure outnumbered the figure for two types of tourists. Special exhibition visitors also showed a significant increase to 37700 visitors, while visitor aged under 15 showed an opposite trend, reaching at 87000. At the end of the period, adult visitors saw a sharp decline by around 20000 visitors, while the number of children also declined significantly to 82300, twofold to the figure for special exhibition visitors.
- The graph below shows the rate of smoking per 1000 people in Someland from 1960 to 2000
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams like football But others think taking part in individual sports is better like swimming Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- The map shows the changes to a residence hall between 2010 and the present 84
- The graph below shows the three different kinds of emission sources oil coal gas of greenhouse gas in the UK Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Some people believe that developments in the field of artificial intelligence will have a positive impact on our lives in the near future Others by contrast are worried that we are not prepared for a world in which computers are more intelligent than huma 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1238.0 965.302439024 128% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26808510638 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63522126722 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493617021277 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 363.6 283.868780488 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2178536931 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.8 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.9 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160286966188 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0802426658761 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0571960267605 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127939911554 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0575889920867 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.