The bar graph provides the information about the proportion of adults of various age groups in UK who has used Internet on a daily basis from the years 2003 to 2006. Units are measured in a percentage.
Overall, it can be seen that the age group lies between 16 to 24 have used majority of internet in the given period. In addition, 2006 was the year, were all the ages used the internet in a higher proportion.
Moving on to the more detail, the age group of 16 to 24 utilised more internet in 2005 (100%), while the usage in 2003 and 2004 was in a same rate (80% and 80% respectively). In addition, 2006 was comparatively higher among all the age groups, except 16-24.
The further chart demonstrates that the age group of 25 to 44 and 45 to 54 was in a upward trend. However, the people who were at the age of 65 and above used less amount of internet. Moreover, almost 15% of older ones used internet in the year 2004 and 2005, whereas it inclined gradually to 20% in 2006.
- Supermarkets should only sell food produced from within their own country rather than imports from overseas What are your opinions on this 61
- The table below presents the food consumption per person weekly in a European country in 1992 2002 2012 78
- In many countries children are becoming overweight and unhealthy Some people think that the government should have the responsibility what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Some believe that lot of scientific research is a waste of time and money To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Research shows that business meetings discussions and training are happening online nowadays Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 83, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...e group of 25 to 44 and 45 to 54 was in a upward trend. However, the people who w...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, moreover, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 796.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.3027027027 4.92477711251 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44790275615 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551351351351 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8035298391 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.4444444444 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5555555556 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.362808713909 0.215688989381 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145298908919 0.103423049105 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100792605644 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233925877549 0.15604864568 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.082350703262 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 13.2329268293 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.66 11.4140731707 67% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.