The given bar graph illustrates the proportion of netizens of five different age groups, who used the internet everyday in the united kingdom between 2003 and 2006.
Overall, it can be seen that the adults in the 16-24 age group were the maximum who used the internet, while the over 65+ age group had the least Internet users. Interestingly, all age group showed an ap-ward trend.
According to the graph, in 2003 and 2004, the netizens in the 16-24 age group were 80%. In 2005, this figure increased rapidly and peaked at 100% by 2005. However after that decreased slightly and reached about 90% in the next year. In the 25-44 age group, there was a gradual growth in the percentage of internet users, rising from 60% in 2003 to 80% in 2006. A dramatic increase in the internet users was seen in the 45-54 age group, from 60% to 80% in the given period. The percentage of 55-64 year olds who used the internet between 30% and 50% in the given period. The adults in the over 65+ age group were 17% in 2004 and 2005, after that this figure rose gradually to 20% in 2006
- Chorleywood is a village near London whose population has increased steadily since the middle of the nineteenth century The map below shows the development of the village 56
- The table below shows the population of three cities in 1990 the population forecast of 2000 and the actual of 2000 summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparison where relevant 56
- the chart below shows the percentage of adults of different age groups in the UK who used internet everyday from 2003 2006 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 112, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...erent age groups, who used the internet everyday in the united kingdom between 2003 and ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 155, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...sed rapidly and peaked at 100% by 2005. However after that decreased slightly and reach...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 490, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...% in the given period. The percentage of 55-64 year olds who used the internet be...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 875.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.44162436548 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.20294041714 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507614213198 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.5624802285 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.5 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.8 5.23603664747 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.424984114715 0.215688989381 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.158639689426 0.103423049105 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0999794546428 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.296180864984 0.15604864568 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00456164742889 0.0819641961636 6% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 86.03 61.2550243902 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.47 11.4140731707 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.9 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.