The provided bar chart illiterates the proportion of adults of five different age groups, who used the internet every day in the United Kingdom for a period of 4 years starting 2003.
Overall, it can be seen that adults in the 6-24 age group were the highest, who used the internet, whereas the over 65 age group had the least percentage of internet users in the given period. The percentage of adults of different age groups showed an up-ward trend with the time.
As shown in the graph, the netizens in 16-24 age group was the highest in all the given period. The adults in the 16-24 age group were 80% in the years 2003 and 2004. In 2005, this figure increased significantly to 100%. However, decreased slightly to 90% in the next year. In 25-44 age group, there was a gradual growth in the percentage of internet , from 45% in 2003 to 80% in 2006. A dramatic increase in the percentage of adults were seen in the 55-64 age group, from 60% in 2003 to 80% in 2006.
The percentage of 55-64 age group who used the internet between 30 and 50% from 2003 to 2006. The percentage of 65+ age group remained between 18 and 20 in the given period.
- the chart below shows the percentage of adults of different age groups in the UK who used internet everyday from 2003 2006 71
- The table below shows the population of three cities in 1990 the population forecast of 2000 and the actual of 2000 summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparison where relevant 56
- Chorleywood is a village near London whose population has increased steadily since the middle of the nineteenth century The map below shows the development of the village 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 23, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d with the time. As shown in the graph, the netizens in 16-24 age group was the ...
^^
Line 4, column 351, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ual growth in the percentage of internet , from 45% in 2003 to 80% in 2006. A dram...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 936.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.41509433962 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33798103163 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.466981132075 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.2272493693 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.0909090909 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2727272727 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.81818181818 5.23603664747 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.00455864281545 0.215688989381 2% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00268643993197 0.103423049105 3% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.00849526898226 0.0843802449381 10% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.00339432552016 0.15604864568 2% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00587914425835 0.0819641961636 7% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 13.2329268293 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 86.03 61.2550243902 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.36 11.4140731707 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.66 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.