The given maps illustrate the infrastructural changes that have happened at village park over a period of a decade.
Overall, it is clear from the maps that the place have changed dramatically in terms of accommodation and recreational options in the given period. A number of facilities have been added to the place to make it a modern place.
10 years ago, the park was fairly some, with the entrance at the North-West corner. The football ball was there in the center of the park. There are two tennis courts towards the North-East of the car park, which about 20 cara was there. There was children's play area, which was located to the North-East of the football pitch. A pond and some woods were in the South-East of the park.
There have been some changes, which can be seen in the village park now. The two tennis courts have been replaced by four tennis courts in the North of the park. Another physical feather, which do not see any change, has been football pitch in the middle of the park. A principal change, has been the addition of a picnic area, which was built towards the South-West of the football pitch. The children's play area has been converted into children's play area and children's soft play area. The pond and some words have been chopped down, where cafe and boating have been constructed there. Finally, a toilet has been made towards the south of the children's soft play area.
- the chart below shows the percentage of adults of different age groups in the UK who used internet everyday from 2003 2006 71
- The table below shows the population of three cities in 1990 the population forecast of 2000 and the actual of 2000 summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparison where relevant 56
- Chorleywood is a village near London whose population has increased steadily since the middle of the nineteenth century The map below shows the development of the village 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 24.0651302605 17% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1161.0 1615.20841683 72% => OK
No of words: 249.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66265060241 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40190190389 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 176.041082164 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.477911646586 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 340.2 506.74238477 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 10.0 2.52805611222 396% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.2999761564 49.4020404114 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 77.4 106.682146367 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.733333333333 7.06120827912 10% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 3.4128256513 293% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0374083199589 0.244688304435 15% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0165850411295 0.084324248473 20% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0319927568412 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0384678307104 0.151304729494 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411236490773 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 13.0946893788 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 50.2224549098 144% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.3001002004 64% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.45 12.4159519038 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.09 8.58950901804 83% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 78.4519038076 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.