The chart depicts, the percentage of difference in income for five countries such as Japan, US, France, UK and Australia between men and women from 1978 to 2008. In a bird's view, Japan reported as the highest income level exception of other four countries.
In terms of, Australia and France in 1978 nearly equal from the former and decreasing at latter .Then these poles are enjoys the similar trends at about 18% of people both men and women are included. Subsequently, directly proportional trends are mentioned. Thereafter, UK and US are the second highest income stated countries. For a while, these are starts with 29% and 33% but further, In 2008 it peaks down to 26% of both the countries. In case of Japan experienced at top level income at former but, it plunging at latter around 39% in 2008.
Having decoded the chart, all countries reported as higher to lower, exception of Australia. However, US and UK are predictably similar for last ten years.
- Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime, others however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishmen 84
- The chart below shows the percentage of difference in income between men and women form 1978 to 2008 56
- The ownership of cars should be restricted to one per family in order to reduce traffic congestion and pollution. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- Some people think the air travel should be restricted because it causes environment pollution. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion and relevant examples. 36
- Learning English at school is often seen as more important than learning local languages .If these are not taught many are at risk of dying out.In your opinion ,is it important for everyone to learn English?Should we try to ensure the survival of local la 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 34, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es. In terms of, Australia and France in 1978 nearly equal from the former and...
^^
Line 3, column 97, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...from the former and decreasing at latter .Then these poles are enjoys the similar ...
^^
Line 3, column 99, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Then
...om the former and decreasing at latter .Then these poles are enjoys the similar tren...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, then, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 802.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86060606061 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60672296023 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.587878787879 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.6368059391 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.1111111111 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232508624783 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0852516671629 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121550575344 0.0843802449381 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163757038993 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129923782227 0.0819641961636 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.