The chart below shows the percentage of difference in income between men and women form 1978 to 2008
The line graph illustrates the income gap between males and females in five nations from 1978 to 2008.
Overall, it is apparent that the proportion of difference in earnings between men and women in the countries witnessed a decreasing trend for most of the period. However, the gap in Australia improved substantially after 1998.
Commencing at 50 per cent in 1978 as the first place, the difference percentage in income between genders in Japan went down gradually by 10 per cent in 2018. Similarly, the period of 1978-2008 experienced a minimal reduction in the earning difference between males and females from 30 per cent to 28 per cent in the US.
In UK and France, the income gap also fell with the same pace over the 30 years. Between 1978 and 2008, there was a slight drop by 3 per cent from 29 per cent and 20 per cent in UK and France, respectively. Whereas, beginning at 19 per cent, the earnings inequality by genders in Australia remained relatively steady until 1998 at approximately 18 per cent before rocketing rapidly to its peak at 14 per cent in the next 10 years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-04 | Tinylavender | 78 | view |
| 2019-03-04 | Tinylavender | 61 | view |
| 2017-03-17 | Jason Pappachan | 56 | view |
| 2017-03-10 | huonglo | 84 | view |
- Caring for children is probably the most important job in any society Because of this all mothers and fathers should be required to take a course that prepares them to be good parents To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view 82
- The two graphs show the main sources of energy in the USA in the 1980s and the 1990s. 61
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choicesTo what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 78
- The table below shows the worldwide market share of the notebook computer market for manufacturers in the year 2006, 2007 and 2014 73
- Some people believe that developments in the field of artificial intelligence will have a positive impact on our lives in the near future. Others, by contrast, are worried that we are not prepared for a world in which computers are more intelligent than h 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 247, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'earnings'' or 'earning's'?
Suggestion: earnings'; earning's
... Whereas, beginning at 19 per cent, the earnings inequality by genders in Australia rema...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, similarly, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 904.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70833333333 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72381393021 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552083333333 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5740414213 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190978344466 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101314247325 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0745137713529 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145311793168 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.055412644096 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.