The chart below shows the percentage of difference in income between men and women from 1978 to 2008
The line graph plots the percentage difference between men's and women's incomes for five countries, the US, Japan, Australia, the UK and France, from 1978 to 2008.
Overall, there was a general trend that was a decrease in the difference of the income between men and women in all countries except for Australia. Besides that, the percentage difference in Japan is always the highest.
In the United States and the United Kingdom, the difference of the earnings between both sexes is quite similar with a slow reduction from 30% in 1978 to approximately 27% in 2008 although the values in the United States stayed at a little higher level when compared with the UK. In France, there was a gradual decline between 1978 and 2008 with the number around 20.
In comparing with France, the qualities of Australia is quite similar from 1978 to 1998. But by the year 2008, it had increased rapidly by 25%. Japanese is always the highest percentage in the difference of income between men and women, at close 50% in 1978 then went down to about 40% in 2008.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-14 | bigdaddy2804 | view | |
| 2023-04-14 | bigdaddy2804 | view | |
| 2021-08-15 | phg_phg | 84 | view |
| 2020-05-08 | Munn Nguyen | 84 | view |
| 2020-02-15 | khoibeo3g | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows the average time spent by four car manufacturers to produce vehicles at their US factories 77
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The bar chart shows the scores of teams A, B and C over four different seasons. 78
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of difference in income between men and women from 1978 to 2008 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... and 2008 with the number around 20. In comparing with France, the qualities of...
^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...8 then went down to about 40% in 2008.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if, then, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 878.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77173913043 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47126682804 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538043478261 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.8080931748 43.030603864 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.75 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.438169643021 0.215688989381 203% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.19580678635 0.103423049105 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121462956579 0.0843802449381 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.300619322377 0.15604864568 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0958656313691 0.0819641961636 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.