The graph below shows the average time spent by four car manufacturers to produce vehicles at their US factories.
The line graph shows the data on the amount of time (hours per vehicle) that four well-known brands spent to manufacture vehicles in the US from 1998 to 2005.
Overall, there wasn’t any significant variation and appeared a general decline among Ford, Toyota, Honda and General Motor over the period of seven years. Therein, the time that Honda spent to produce vehicles is the lowest of the four manufacturers.
General Motor started at 32 hours in 1998, but this number fell gradually in the next 7 years. The situation was better for Ford when the time that this company made transport increases slightly and reached a peak of around 32 in 2001 before had witnessed a continually drop by the year 2005.
Two manufacturers always stayed at the lowest level in whole time which was Honda and Toyota. While Toyota remained stable from 1998 to 2008 by about 24, Honda has a slight growth between 1989 and 2002. But during the remainder of the period, both of these manufacturers spent less time producing vehicles.
- The following bar chart shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960, 1980 and 2000. 67
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The chart shows the division of household tasks by gender in Great Britain 11
- The graph below shows the average time spent by four car manufacturers to produce vehicles at their US factories 77
- The chart below shows the percentage of difference in income between men and women from 1978 to 2008 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 257, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('continually') instead an adjective, or a noun ('drop') instead of another adjective.
... around 32 in 2001 before had witnessed a continually drop by the year 2005. Two manufacturers ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 853.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90229885057 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51601423928 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64367816092 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0065450292 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.625 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266349934447 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123678903901 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123047929994 0.0843802449381 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166452439464 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106963281942 0.0819641961636 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.