The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rentedaccommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, andmake comparisons where relevant.

The bar chart displays the proportion between private household and leased accommodation in England and Wales from 1912 to 2011.
It is clear that there was a considerable fall in the number of personal housing, and the percentage of rented households increased steadily between 1918 and 2001. Overall, the proportion of personal housing had reached the highest number in 1918, compared to the lowest percentage of rented housing at the same time. Plus there was the same rate of both households in owned and rented accommodation in 1971.
First of all, the rate of personal accommodation had slumped from around 76% to nearly a third between 1918 and 2001 until a gradual increase in 2011. Whereas, there was a steep growth in the percent of leased housing from around 20% in 1918 to approximate 3 quarter in 2001, then a dip in 2011.
Second of all, there was a largest proportion of private household in 1918, nearly 80%, but also was the lowest rate of rented accommodation with just around 22% at the same time. Finally, the rate of both axes reached the same percent in 1971 with exactly 50%.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 26, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...dip in 2011. Second of all, there was a largest proportion of private household...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, second, so, then, third, whereas, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 914.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81052631579 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62959925536 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.468421052632 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.2722791262 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.25 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.125 5.23603664747 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153584569854 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0801152309755 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590537097532 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113000787584 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0637288992919 0.0819641961636 78% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.