The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.
The bar chart compares the proportion of households owning and renting accommodation in England and Wales from 1918 to 2011. From a general perspective, it could be observed that the percentage of households in owned accommodation had a grown, while this figure for households in rented accommodation saw a reduction.
It is evident from the information provided that households renting accommodation's percentage was higher than households owning accommodation, at over 75% and 20% respectively in 1918. Between 1918 and 1971, the proportion of households renting accommodation experienced a huge decline by over a quarter. In contrast, the proportion of households owning accommodation witnessed a significant rise by about 27%. At the end of the period, both types of accommodation stayed the same at 50%.
From 1971 to 2011, households renting accommodation's percentage continued its fall from the previous period, while households owning accommodation's percentage considerably grew from 50% to nearly 65%. There also was a large gap between households in owned and rented accommodation, in which households in owned accommodation exceeded households in rented accommodation by about 20% in 2011.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-25 | Ji Due | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-20 | CharanpreetSingh | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | Loi Chau | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | Jay297 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-11 | aria etemadi | 78 | view |
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kindom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 73
- The line graph below gives information about the number of visitors to three London museums between June and September 2013. 67
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 61
- The diagrams below give information on transport and car use in Edmonton. 73
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 3.97073170732 378% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1026.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.7 4.92477711251 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.54858692099 2.65546596893 134% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494444444444 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6087155161 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.25 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.517021301517 0.215688989381 240% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.268783437912 0.103423049105 260% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136429901362 0.0843802449381 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.399146234447 0.15604864568 256% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.065290841352 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 61.2550243902 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.3012195122 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.08 11.4140731707 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.