The chart below shows the percentage of households in rented and owned accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011
Given a diagram illustrating the quality of owned and rented houses in UK and Wales from 1918 to 2011. It is apparent from the information supplied that the rented houses showed a significant decrease while there was an increase in the percentage of owned houses.
Increasing from over a little bit 20% in 1918 and doubled to 50% in 1971, the proportion of these families that owned accommodation continually rose nearly 70% in 2011 before dropping to approximately 64% in 2011. In contrast with the exponential growth of owned houses, these rented one, at the beginning of the period, demonstrated the dominant position with the highest percent about 78% in 1918. However, this proportion brought a sustained decline in this figure after the high. Moreover, the following two years remained at 69%. After that, it saw a rapid fall in the percentage to somewhere in the vicinity of 31% in 2001, followed by a climb in 2011 to about 35%.
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. Agree or disagree? 11
- Everyone should become vegetarian because they do not need to eat meat to have a healthy diet. Do you agree or disagree? 61
- Some people think that good health is a basic human need so the medical service should not be run by profit-making companies.Do you think the disadvantages outweigh the advantages. 78
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry. Why is this the case? What can be done about this problem? 67
- In some countries, young people have little leisure time and are under a lot of pressure to work hard in their studies.What do you think are the causes of this?What solutions can you suggest? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 24, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...f owned houses. Increasing from over a little bit 20% in 1918 and doubled to 50% in 1971,...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 217, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...opping to approximately 64% in 2011. In contrast with the exponential growth of owned ho...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 778.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8625 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7955321497 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6125 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 232.2 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7074463731 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.142857143 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26657933695 0.215688989381 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106730017591 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0850969880074 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217933665458 0.15604864568 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0532328875214 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.