The chart below shows the percentage of households in rented and owned accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011
Given a diagram illustrating the quality of owned and rented houses in UK and Wales from 1918 to 2011. It is apparent from the information supplied that the rented houses showed a significant decrease while there was an increase in the percentage of owned houses.
Increasing from over a little bit 20% in 1918 and doubled to 50% in 1971, the proportion of these families that owned accommodation continually rose nearly 70% in 2011 before dropping to approximately 64% in 2011. In contrast with the exponential growth of owned houses, these rented one, at the beginning of the period, demonstrated the dominant position with the highest percent about 78% in 1918. However, this proportion brought a sustained decline in this figure after the high. Moreover, the following two years remained at 69%. After that, it saw a rapid fall in the percentage to somewhere in the vicinity of 31% in 2001, followed by a climb in 2011 to about 35%.
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 78
- Everyone should become vegetarian because they do not need to eat meat to have a healthy diet. Do you agree or disagree? 61
- The graph shows the amount of junk food in Uk 56
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone calls provided into three categories from 1995 2000 89
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry. Why is this the case? What can be done about this problem? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 24, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...f owned houses. Increasing from over a little bit 20% in 1918 and doubled to 50% in 1971,...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 217, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...opping to approximately 64% in 2011. In contrast with the exponential growth of owned ho...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 778.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8625 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7955321497 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6125 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 232.2 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7074463731 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.142857143 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26657933695 0.215688989381 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106730017591 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0850969880074 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217933665458 0.15604864568 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0532328875214 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.