The chart below shows the percentage of people accessing news via media in one country in 2013, 2015 and 2017.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevent.
The bar chart gives information about the proportion of inhabitants which accessed new by four categories of media, including television, newspaper, radio and the internet in a particular country in 2013, 2015 and 2017.
According to statistics, it is noticeable that most people used television as a means to get news, accounting for more or less than 70 percent in three points of year. On the other hand, newspaper as well as radio was not popular for accessing to news. The former suffered from a decline from more than 40 percent in 2013 to just over 20 percent in 2017 while the latter was nearly unchanged over the period, with the figure approximately 30 percent. In the terms of the internet, it saw a significant increase in percentage of inhabitants accessing. It was in 2013 that the internet was utilised by about 30 percent of people, yet number of that soared to nearly 70 percent in 2017.
Overall, people were more and more interseted in the internet while a few of them used newspaper as well as radio. Moreover, a majority of inhabitants accessed to news by televions in 2013, 2015 and 2017.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-02 | quan12341234 | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-09 | sunflower.cow | 78 | view |
| 2022-08-19 | chauanhyeudau | 78 | view |
| 2021-03-21 | Phạm Hoàng Trung | 63 | view |
- The chart below shows the percentage of people accessing news via media in one country in 2013 2015 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevent 78
- Many people think modern communication technology is having some negative effects on social relationship Do you agree or disagree 67
- Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person Why do you think this is the case What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person Give reasons f 89
- Many students find it difficult to concentrate or pay attention at school What are the reasons What could be done 56
- Many manufactured food and drink products contain high level of sugar which cause may health problems Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar Do you agree or disagree 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, well, while, as well as, more or less, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 922.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77720207254 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79206832307 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554404145078 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8694513756 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.25 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.125 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.25 5.23603664747 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175188652043 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.085948918976 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0728252001715 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144124255671 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0503224790557 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.