The chart below shows the percentage of population in these three diferent age groups in Japan
The line graph depicts the proportion of residents belonging to three different age groups in Japan over a period of 80 years starting from 1960.
Overall, immatures account for the highest percentage among them, which is far more higher than the remaining two groups throughout this period. Besides this, elderly though had the smallest figure in terms of quantity, they are clearly showing a constant increase even in the future.
Starting at roughly 65 percent in 1960, the people aged 14 below mainly remained unchanged until 2000. A decrease can be witnessed in the number of inhabitants aged from 15 to 64 years old, which account for 10 percent in 2000, while an opposite trend is true in elderly with a gradual climb and gain of about 25% in the same year.
From 2000 onwards, the proportion of younger people tends to slightly plummet though it is still expected to get the highest rate in all groups. Meanwhile, the oldest residents group surpassed the working age group and will continue their climbing to just above 30 percent in 2040 as a prediction.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-09-04 | hardyboywwe | 78 | view |
- People in all modern societies use drugs but today s youth are experimenting with both legal and illegal drugs and at an increasingly early age Some sociologists claim that parents and other members of society often set a bad example Discuss the causes an 84
- The chart below shows numbers of incidents and injuries per 100 million passenger miles travelled PMT by transportation type in 2002 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The threat of nuclear weapons maintain world peaces Nuclear power provide cheap and clean energy The benefits of nuclear outwheigh the disadvantage 56
- bar graph and table 11
- The chart below shows the percentage of population in these three diferent age groups in Japan 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 80, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'higher' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: higher
...est percentage among them, which is far more higher than the remaining two groups throughou...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 893.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90659340659 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46705744132 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.692307692308 0.547539520022 126% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.0667002923 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.571428571 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57142857143 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171709059663 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0729330994351 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528482411411 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0997198425156 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0401729198235 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.