The chart below shows the price in Euros of 800 grams of four types of bread in one European country from 2001 to 2006
The line chart compares the cost of 800 grams of four types of breads in a particular European nation over half of a decade between 2001 and 2006.
Overall, the price of Wholegrain stayed unchanged over the period while there were considerable upward trends for the other breed brands. Another interesting point is that those three brands had the same beginning point in 2001.
Looking at details, the residents spent 0.8 euros for Wholegrain and 0.6 euros for each other brands. In the next year, this figure has doubled for Wholegrain, at 1.8 euros and increased dramatically for Brown and White by nearly 0.9 euros and 0,4 euros, respectively. By contrast, Rye bread witnessed a minor fall to 0.5 euros at the same time.
Over the rest of period given, the expenditure people spend on White and Rye bread have improved annually, reached 1.3 euros and 0.7 euros in turn. Meanwhile, after reached a peak at 2002 the price of Wholegrain bread dropped enormously then returned the initial point at the end of period. On the other hand, since this figure for Brown bread had surpassed other brands, ranked the first place since 2003, however, this price just fluctuated between 1.4 and ad 1.6 euros throughout the period.
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between1920 and 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and makecomparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below shows the percentage of the population in the UK who consumed the recommended daily amount of fruit and vegetables in 2002 2006 and 2010 89
- The bar chart shows the percentage of the total world population in 4 countries in 1950 and 2003 and projections for 2050 62
- the percentage of different types of waste recycled 86
- The chart shows the proportion of people in a UK survey carried out in three different years who said they were interested in certain sports. 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, look, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1017.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88942307692 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42619895786 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605769230769 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3564743095 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1111111111 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222484926513 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0967987168693 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0964784424985 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156586345623 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122281797541 0.0819641961636 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.