This chart illustrates the information of observation, peoples drinking coffee or tea in the past four-week in five various places in the Australia.
Overall, people are more like to sip instant coffee than the fresh coffee moreover, the people in the Hobart more drinking coffee to compare other cities. The people in the city Sydney are more like to dink fresh coffee and people in Melbourne were mostly drank coffee or tea from the shops.
To beginning, the people were more like to drink coffee or tea from outside than home except Adelaide. The people in Sydney went to coffee shop around 61% and people drink instant coffee 46%, fresh coffee around 44 %. The highest percent of people drinking from shop in Melbourne, approximately 3% more than Sydney. Fresh coffee used around 43% and instant was more around 5%.
On the top of that, the people in Brisbane lowest percent of using fresh coffee close to 34% and the difference between the instant coffee and people went to the coffee shop was merely under 4%. In the place Adelaide, the percent of people more using instant coffee compared to fresh coffee and people went to brought coffee. Finally, around 38% of people using fresh coffee, 16% more instant coffee and 26% went to coffee shops.
- the pie charts and table gives information about the total value and sources of fish imported to the US between 1988 and 2000
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The graph below shows relative rates of language acquisition according to different study methods 69
- The table below shows the worldwide market share of the notebook computer market for manufacturers in the years 2006 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- the pie charts and table gives information about the total value and sources of fish imported to the US between 1988 and 2000
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, moreover
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1044.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85581395349 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.21038514045 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.418604651163 0.547539520022 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 306.9 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.2215842915 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.4 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.1 5.23603664747 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195853641128 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116288514163 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0488268018132 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162030713345 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0358048595207 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.81 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.