The chart below shows the results of a survey about people's coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The provided chart delineates the finding of a survey about the resident's coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian metropolises.
Overall, Visiting a cafe for coffee or tea was the most favored feature in all the cities except in Brisbane where almost the same number of citizens prefer instant coffee. Buying fresh coffee was least common in the metropolises.
A glance at the graph reveals that most people in Melbourne, Hobart, Sydney, and Brisbane favored to visit a restaurant for coffee. The graph demonstrated that the percentages were approximately 64%, 63%, 62%, and 55% respectively. However, In Adelaide, it was About 50% and equally common with instant coffee. This was the lowest for this trend. Popularity of instant coffee was always above 45%, peaked in Brisbane (almost 53%), and was the least in Sydney (almost 45%).
Turning to fresh coffee buyers, this trend was never as high as 45%. Numbers were quite similar in Brisbane and Adelaide which was under 35% and the lowest of all. Moreover, Sydney exhibited the highest percentage of fresh coffee consumers compared with others
- The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site 67
- Some people prefer to live in a small town Others prefer to live in a big city Which place would you prefer to live in Use specific reasons and details to support your answer 67
- The graph and pie chart below give information on in house training courses in a large financial company Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Nowadays more people prefer to communicate via text message and email instead of face to face Why do you think this is the best way When is face to face communication necessary 84
- Failure is proof that the desire wasn t strong enough To what extent do you agree with this statement Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience You should write at least 250 words 11
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 65, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'residents'' or 'resident's'?
Suggestion: residents'; resident's
...eates the finding of a survey about the residents coffee and tea buying and drinking habi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 214, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es were approximately 64%, 63%, 62%, and 55% respectively. However, In Adelaide, ...
^^
Line 5, column 272, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... However, In Adelaide, it was About 50% and equally common with instant coffee. ...
^^
Line 7, column 137, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in Brisbane and Adelaide which was under 35% and the lowest of all. Moreover, Sy...
^^
Line 7, column 142, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...isbane and Adelaide which was under 35% and the lowest of all. Moreover, Sydney ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, moreover
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 940.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16483516484 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58293191044 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565934065934 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.6830733692 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.4545454545 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5454545455 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.54545454545 5.23603664747 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15502298717 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.06436495906 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0988301706847 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141260026524 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131685352476 0.0819641961636 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 65, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'residents'' or 'resident's'?
Suggestion: residents'; resident's
...eates the finding of a survey about the residents coffee and tea buying and drinking habi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 214, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es were approximately 64%, 63%, 62%, and 55% respectively. However, In Adelaide, ...
^^
Line 5, column 272, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... However, In Adelaide, it was About 50% and equally common with instant coffee. ...
^^
Line 7, column 137, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in Brisbane and Adelaide which was under 35% and the lowest of all. Moreover, Sy...
^^
Line 7, column 142, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...isbane and Adelaide which was under 35% and the lowest of all. Moreover, Sydney ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, moreover
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 940.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16483516484 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58293191044 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565934065934 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.6830733692 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.4545454545 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5454545455 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.54545454545 5.23603664747 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15502298717 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.06436495906 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0988301706847 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141260026524 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131685352476 0.0819641961636 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.