The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billion) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.

The chart illustrates the entire time consumption of contacting in the UK in the period of 7 years from 1995.

Overall, the majority of calling lines focuses on three groups: local, global and mobile phones. Although the mobiles had dramatically raised through the time, they still are the lowest percentage of the chart. On the contrary, home phones went up and down gradually, but it was able to keep the highest rate.

The peek minutes which are estimated by millions was up to 90 million, and that is also the top of the triangle of the local - fixed lines, it started at over 70 million minutes and ended nearly similarly. Constantly, the national and international - fixed lines increased and remained its stable increment (at about 5 million minutes annually except for the final two years which were durable).

Regarding the last division, the number of consumers used mobile phones raised strongly every year, about 1 million in the first year, 2 million in the second year, 3 million in the third year but since the fourth year there was an explosion of calls with mobiles ( 10 million each year )

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 264, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e was an explosion of calls with mobiles 10 million each year
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, regarding, second, similarly, so, still, third, except for, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 920.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86772486772 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49966966925 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650793650794 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.5741875578 43.030603864 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.428571429 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.2857142857 5.23603664747 254% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10101575466 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0558551488602 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0530818160658 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0782629946134 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0566661799648 0.0819641961636 69% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.