The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade - labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, make comparisons where relevant.

The two tables illustrate the income of coffee and bananas sold in five European sections in 1994 and 2004. Those products are named Fairtrade due to a good deal for the farmers from developing countries.

Overall, the unit of currency in the table is euro measured in millions. The trends of the five areas all go upwards but differently, and the most economical countries are the UK in coffee and Switzerland in bananas throughout the years (from 1999 to 2004).

At the beginning of the first table, Switzerland led the lists ( five countries ) but the growth is disappointingly slight, so do the others except for the UK, Denmark (1.8 to 2), Belgium (1 to 1.7) and Sweden (0.8 to 1) while the UK had risen up to a little 13 times more than its platform in 1999.

Regarding the revenues of bananas, the UK again has the greatest amount of money they earned for half of a decade from 1999, for the records: 15 million euros and 47 million euros. The UK only takes the second place in the second chart with an intermediate profit 1 in 1999 and 5.5 in 2004. Belgium has the same increment rate as the UK (about 4 million euros) but it only has the third position due to its poor start. The unremarkable others are Sweden and Denmark since they had decreased their turnovers ( from 1.8 to 1 for Sweden and from 2 to 0.9 for Denmark)

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 63, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e first table, Switzerland led the lists five countries but the growth is disapp...
^^
Line 5, column 79, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...witzerland led the lists five countries but the growth is disappointingly slight...
^^
Line 7, column 505, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...since they had decreased their turnovers from 1.8 to 1 for Sweden and from 2 to 0...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, regarding, second, so, third, while, except for

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1080.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 243.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.44444444444 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50930291672 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 106.607317073 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 312.3 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.1682305433 43.030603864 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128748474612 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0624053113524 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0607854703998 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0973956985702 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0648478550652 0.0819641961636 79% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.77 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.