the chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995 to 2002.
The chart gives information about the amount of time that people in the UK spending on three different kinds of telephone calls, from 1995 to 2002.
Overall, while local-fixed lines tended to experience a decline during the last three years researched, national and international-fixed lines, as well as mobiles, increased moderately each year.
In 1995, domestic-fixed lines accounted for over 70 billion minutes, which were nearly twice higher than that of national and worlwide-fixed lines. In comparison, mobiles were only responsible for over one-twentieth of the total number of telephone calls. After the following four years, local lines reached its peak, at about 90 billion minutes, which remained a big gap compared to both other kinds of telephone calls, standing at about nearly 50 billion and 9 billion respectively.
From this time onwards, domestic lines inclined to decrease year by year, while the rest two categories showed an opposite trend. In 2002, the difference between these three telephone calls narrowed down, but the local lines were still the highest, about 70 billion. National and internation-fixed lines increased slightly, only about 1 to 5 billion per year while mobiles experienced a considerable rise in number, ranging from 10 to 17 billion minutes each year, except the last year in the given period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-09 | Trần Như Cát Tường | 95 | view |
| 2023-03-18 | nguyet141201 | view | |
| 2023-03-10 | calarasl | 67 | view |
| 2023-01-04 | giangngoc | 78 | view |
| 2022-09-30 | lattethuc | 56 | view |
- the chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 to 2002 89
- The chart below shows the total numbers of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 to 2002
- The chart below shows the total numbers of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 to 2002
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sports center now and how it will look after redevelopment 73
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement making process and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, still, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1137.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38862559242 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99191426239 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625592417062 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 341.1 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3954843569 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.125 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.375 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248715877496 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114081486985 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0693745293551 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152243327485 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0880810858562 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.2329268293 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.