The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone call in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.
Summarise the information by selecting a reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the total number of minutes of telephone calls in the UK in three different categories between 1995 and 2002.
Overall, it can be seen that the figure for local calls was the highest in three categories. Additionally, the figure for national/international calls and mobiles witnessed an upward trend during the period.
According to the chart, in 1995, the number of minutes of local calls was more than 70 minutes, which was considerably higher than naitonal/international calls and mobiles. The figure rose rapidly and peaked at 90 minutes in 1990. The minutes of local calls witnessed first decrease in 2000. At the end of the period, the minutes of telephone local calls stayed the same as the data in 1995.
In 1995, the number of minutes of national and international calls in the UK was 2 minutes, which was the lowest data, and followed by mobiles, with nearly 40 minutes. During the period, the figure for naitonal and international calls increased steadily and reached more than 60 minutes at the end of the period. The figure for mobiles grew significantly from 1995 to 2002, the minutes of mobiles was 45 minutes in 2002. The distance between three categories was reduced during the 12-year period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-14 | dkhnh_2603 | view | |
| 2022-06-22 | dkhnh_2603 | 67 | view |
| 2021-08-19 | chi150901 | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-09 | longtran | 81 | view |
| 2021-08-09 | longtran | 73 | view |
- Although there is a lot of translation software available learning a language could still be advantageous To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary schools rather than secondary school Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 56
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone call in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002 Summarise the information by selecting a reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- At the present time the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults compared with the number of older people Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages 67
- To succeed in business one needs to learn and know math To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 58, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...chart, in 1995, the number of minutes of local calls was more than 70 minutes, wh...
^^
Line 4, column 9, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the same as the data in 1995. In 1995, the number of minutes of national and in...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1037.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00966183575 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03895070028 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.454106280193 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 311.4 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.33902439024 254% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.1725096878 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.2727272727 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8181818182 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.818181818182 5.23603664747 16% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234995381416 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11242955931 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0961231266564 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193972368349 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120566958498 0.0819641961636 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 58, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...chart, in 1995, the number of minutes of local calls was more than 70 minutes, wh...
^^
Line 4, column 9, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the same as the data in 1995. In 1995, the number of minutes of national and in...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1037.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00966183575 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03895070028 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.454106280193 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 311.4 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.33902439024 254% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.1725096878 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.2727272727 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8181818182 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.818181818182 5.23603664747 16% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234995381416 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11242955931 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0961231266564 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193972368349 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120566958498 0.0819641961636 147% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.