The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chat provides information about the duration of phone calls per annum (in billion minutes), categorized as local, national/international and mobile over a period of 7 years, between 1995 and 2002 in the United Kingdom.
According to the bar chart, minutes of mobile calls are the lowest of all categories, from 1995 to 2002 but their growth in 7 years is the highest i.e. from a few billions they have expanded to approximately 45 billion minutes. While national and international calls have made a moderate length during the whole time-period, with rise of more than 20 billion minutes by the end (2002).
However, local fixed line minutes are the same in 1995 and 2002, which does not mean they were constant during these 7 years, instead there was a noticeable increase of nearly 20 billion minutes in first four years (1995-1999), then they underwent a considerable downfall over next three years (1999-2002).
Overall, the total no. of minutes of mobile and national/international calls have grown over seven years where as those of local calls have experienced a mixed trend, at first, they increased and then towards the end they decreased up-to the earliest level.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-04 | morbymuku | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-17 | SylviaMazhiqian | 84 | view |
| 2019-10-17 | SylviaMazhiqian | 84 | view |
| 2019-10-17 | SylviaMazhiqian | 61 | view |
| 2019-08-30 | winkpx | 73 | view |
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The charts below give Information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy In 2000 and projections for 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 82
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 88
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 87
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree the statement. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 82, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...he duration of phone calls per annum in billion minutes, categorized as local, national...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 106, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...ional calls have grown over seven years where as those of local calls have experienced a...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 989.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07179487179 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0550504633 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610256410256 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 87.8995638973 43.030603864 204% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 164.833333333 112.824112599 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.5 22.9334400587 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213265492549 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112037005465 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0520879766336 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130874847755 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0477130021002 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.2329268293 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.72 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.