The chart below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart below illustrates the value of a country’s exports in many categories between 2015 and 2016, in addition to the table that draws about the percentage of each section of export’s value change in 2016 compared with 2015. Units are measured in $ billion and percentage. Overall, we can notice that in all sectors there is an increase in the money and percentage of the value of exports during 2016 except in the group of Gems and Jewelry where there is a small decrease shown (in 2016).
At the beginning, this country exported various categories in the past two years (2015 & 2016) many in which had the chance to gain more money and increase in value. The Petroleum products along with the Engineered goods made a good and advanced profit from 2015 to 2016 together with the percentage change in values (increased by 3% and by 8.5%).
However, according to the section of Gems and Jewelry there is a small decline by 5.18% where export earnings decreased by somehow $2 billion. In contrast with Agriculture products and Textiles we can see a profit of 0.81% and 15.24% which means that by year the export of this country is earning a fortune from different sectors.
In the end, this country’s export earnings is in relation with the percentage in value of years 2015 and 1016. It made a lot of profits by a year (2016 compared with 2015) with a small loss in the category of Gems and Jewelry (by 5.18%). Export Earnings gain the government many benefits and keeps its GDP high.
- the two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The graph below gives information about changes in the birth and death rates in New Zealand between 1901 and 2101 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 88
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 268, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...ared with 2015. Units are measured in $ billion and percentage. Overall, we can notice ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 94, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun in seems to be countable; consider using: 'many ins'.
Suggestion: many ins
...ories in the past two years 2015 & 2016 many in which had the chance to gain more money...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 131, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ere export earnings decreased by somehow billion. In contrast with Agriculture pr...
^^
Line 7, column 133, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...e export earnings decreased by somehow billion. In contrast with Agriculture products ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 145, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...nings decreased by somehow billion. In contrast with Agriculture products and Textiles ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 33.7804878049 166% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1245.0 965.302439024 129% => OK
No of words: 262.0 196.424390244 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75190839695 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58216393598 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.484732824427 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 356.4 283.868780488 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.925469355 43.030603864 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.5 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.1 5.23603664747 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.439755664812 0.215688989381 204% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.178579736043 0.103423049105 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.152304528472 0.0843802449381 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.286857901017 0.15604864568 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.14082485548 0.0819641961636 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.