The chart below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.
The revenue of exports of one country in five different types of product between 2015 and 2016 are illustrated in bar chart as well as table.
Overall, the export earnings of gems and jewelry declined steadily while the others showed the reverse. Also, the highest profit of exports came from petroleum products.
The figure for petroleum products export revenue increased slightly by 3% in a year-period from 2015 to 2016. Following this, there was a significant improvement in the engineering goods export earnings by just under 9%. By contrast, gems and jewelry export incomes fell gradually from just under 45 to 40 billion dollars.
By 2016, the figures for agricultural product’s export earnings had remained reasonably stable, while the export income from textiles had soared markedly by just above less than a fifth. Another striking point is textiles had the highest growth from export profits throughout the year compared to other categories.
- Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters such as food clothes and entertainment is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes Other people believe that it is important 81
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.Discuss both these views a 73
- Some people think that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters such as food, clothes and entertainment is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes. Other people believe that it is important 67
- The chart below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015. 61
- The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel’s customer service. The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 813.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34868421053 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70335503821 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.638157894737 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.2889832891 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.625 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248220002099 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112439838244 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0633541005242 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162306686326 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0478537920582 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.