The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015
The graph shows information about garbage delivered to the recycling company from 2011 to 2015
Overall, all types of garbage seemed to have an uptrend over the period. However, paper and glass trash stood at the top through 4 years which was the opposite of tins and garden trash standing at the bottom of the graph.
In detail, paper and glass volumes were 57 tons and 48 tons in 2011. After a slight decrease in 2012, they changed in 2013 since paper was lower than glass at 40 and 48 tons. Then a year later, everything came back. Paper jumped to 51 tons which was 5 tons higher than glass. However, in 2015 the amount of paper dramatically rocketed to 70 tons and nearly 20 percent higher than glass which was just about 52 tons.
Besides, tins and garden trash had lower quantities of 35 tons and 32 tons in 2011. After a year, garbage tons decreased by 27 tons, and garden trash was half of the first year. These numbers gradually increased over three years, with the exception of 2014 when they dropped to 33 tons and 27 tons. The numbers last year were 39 tons and 35 tons, respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-19 | hahoaan | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Huyenlbg87 | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
- The table below presents the food consumption per person weekly in a European country in 1992 2002 and 2012
- The maps below show the changes in a town after the construction of a hydroelectric power dam 81
- The graph below shows the average retirement age of males and females in six countries in 2003 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart below shows the average cost of monthly contract for four different mobile cell phones in a European country from January to September 2002 measured in euro 73
- Students leave high school without learning how to manage their money What are the reasons and solutions for this issue 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 231, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...s gradually increased over three years, with the exception of 2014 when they dropped to 33 tons and 2...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, however, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 905.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.50248756219 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.18951826842 2.65546596893 82% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55223880597 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.6532491139 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.2727272727 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2727272727 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.63636363636 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0723466423296 0.215688989381 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0303470471594 0.103423049105 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0580180141835 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0907251840028 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.130374540124 0.0819641961636 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 87.05 61.2550243902 142% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.82 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.12 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.