The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course. The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after 5 years.
The pie chart below compares the data about the Anthropology student from one university did after graduating from the program. While the table presents the salaries of the anthropologist after 5 years of working. In general, full-time work accounted for the largest proportion in the destination of anthropology graduates. In addition, the majority of government employers were making the highest salary within a given period.
It could be easily observed from the pie chart that graduates were employed full-time held the lion's share, with 52 percent. 15 percent of total graduates were appointed in a part-time job, taking the second position. Unemployment, graduate study, or unknown, and part-time together with graduate study ranged from 8 to 15 percent.
In comparison with the figures of the anthropology of student's initial occupations after graduation, those of the anthropologists' salaries after 5 years experiences were completely different. Government workers led the distribution, as 50% made up more than $100,000 as opposed to 40% and 30% freelancers and private workers, respectively. A similar trend can be seen in freelance and freelance consultants, with 5 and 15 percent in the slab below $75,000. Private companies represented 10 percent in the lowest income range, a striking 35 percent earning $50,000 to $74,999, while 25 percent and 30 percent of graduates made $75,000- $99,999 and $100,000+, respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-08 | nguyendangquang.aspect | view | |
| 2023-10-05 | dhphuc7866 | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-19 | steveminh | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-17 | Bùi Xuân Tiến | 50 | view |
| 2023-06-25 | Dipesh1234 | 73 | view |
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows the average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The chart below shows the percentage of people accessing news via different media in one country in 2013 2015 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 63
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Some people believe that purchasing imported agricultural products has positive effect Others think consuming domestic products is better Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 9, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'charts'.
Suggestion: charts
The pie chart below compares the data about the Anthr...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 4, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
... study ranged from 8 to 15 percent. In comparison with the figures of the anthropology of...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, so, while, in addition, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1202.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46363636364 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12784085748 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604545454545 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 352.8 283.868780488 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4353837647 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.272727273 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.63636363636 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235790256782 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104107493185 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111963816575 0.0843802449381 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181530818068 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.130380704806 0.0819641961636 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 40.7170731707 169% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.