Some people believe that purchasing imported agricultural products has positive effect. Others think consuming domestic products is better. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
It is common belief that importing farm products from other countries is a good thing for us to do. However, there are more persuasive argument that society would benefit if customers purchased and consumed domestic goods, which would protect the livelihood of local farmers by letting prices drop to low.
On the one hand, purchasing agricultural products from abroad allow people to consume a greater variety of food items. That means, importing products that cannot be grown domestically gives local customers much more choice in the market. For example, kiwifruits are very difficult to grow in Vietnam, so few farmers are willing to plant them. This result in an extreme dearth supply of domestically grown kiwifruit. Fortunately, importing fruits such as these is very common nowadays., they are available in most markets. This makes it much easier for ordinary people to enjoy exotic fruits.
On the other hand, it is more important to protect domestic agriculture. That means, this has negative consequences for the farming industry, which is not always able to compete. Products imported from places where they grow easily are often cheaper, when these low-price products hit the market, they push prices down in a level that cannot be kept up with by local farmers. For instance, in France, where the country’s high labor and equipment costs make the price of domestically agricultural product rather expensive. When cheaper meat and dairy items import from Spain are introduced, the local farmers simply could not deliver products to market at prices that are competitive with in the import. This led to farmers going out of business.
From the analysis above, it is clear that importing items from abroad will increases customer’s choice. But it is undeniable that consuming domestic farm products should be our top priority.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-22 | Phạm Hoàng Trung | 67 | view |
- The graph below shows the average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today 73
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The graph and table below show the average monthly temperatures and the average number of hours of sunshine per year in three major cities 78
- The chart below shows the percentage of people accessing news via different media in one country in 2013 2015 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 307, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... farmers by letting prices drop to low. On the one hand, purchasing agricultural...
^^^
Line 4, column 76, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'increase'
Suggestion: increase
...r that importing items from abroad will increases customer’s choice. But it is undeniable...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, for example, for instance, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1551.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23986486486 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63653592359 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591216216216 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1185504394 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.9375 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6875 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23906682265 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0816504458697 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0601683148495 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152154361264 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0293171553245 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.