The chart give information about visitors to the US from different countries from 1988 to 1992
The pie chart illustrates the proportion of travelers visiting the US from various nations from 1988 to 1992.
Overall, the percentage of visitors from Canada and other countries decreased steadily during the period, while the figure for Chinese people increased significantly. It is also noticeable that the proportion of Canadians remained the highest over the period shown.
In all three years, a majority of Canadians visited the United States. However, there was a substantial decline in the proportion of people from Canada, from 53 per cent in 1988 to two fifths of total people visiting the US in 4 years later. Meanwhile, with just 10% of Chinese tourists in the first year, the figure for China rose dramatically to around 30% in 1990 and then grew to exactly 30% by 1992.
With regard to the remaining percentage of tourists to the US, the percentage of Mexicans traveling to the US remained relatively stable at around 25 per cent in the 4 year period, despite a fall of 5% to around one – fifth in 1990. In contrast, others travelers visiting the US experienced a gradual drop, with only 4% at the end of the period, which was one third of its figure in 1988.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-06 | VietAn97 | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-10 | thảo vy | 67 | view |
| 2020-11-15 | Ajantha J | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-02 | kidosince2000 | 72 | view |
| 2019-07-01 | Giang Tran | 56 | view |
- Task 2: Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams, like football, while other people think that taking part in individual sports, like tennis or swimming, is better. Discuss both views and give your own 78
- The chart give information about visitors to the US from different countries from 1988 to 1992 84
- The graph below shows consumers' average annual expenditure on cell phone, national andinternational fixed-line and services in America between 2001 and 2010. 67
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.Why is this the case?What can be done about this problem? 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, so, then, third, while, in contrast, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 976.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78431372549 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69417044787 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558823529412 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0936586256 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.625 5.23603664747 184% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241074155384 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108891403146 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122789087936 0.0843802449381 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179082317682 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121426375041 0.0819641961636 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.