The tendency of human beings to copy one another is shown in the popularity of fashion clothes and consumer goods. To what extent do you agree?
Nowadays a great number of people have a tendency to imitate objects from either individual or local communities, particularly in the aspect of fashion outfits and consumer products. Personally, I completely agree with this view for these following reasons.
It is clear that imitating fashion clothes is one of the effective methods allowing human beings to make their adaptations to the contemporary society. Regarding social events, for example, people are always concerned about their appearance which can be associated with the types of clothes they would like to wear. Each individual might then express their desire to find appealing outfits that are suitable for the events by replicating the fashion styles of celebrities. Thus, this enables people to adjust quickly to those events with satisfaction as well as to make fashion clothes popular.
On the other hand, people are inclined to consume prevailing commodities as they provide a large amount of benefits for their users. First of all, people are able to buy decent products without hesitation, which results in the popularity of consumer goods. To put it simply, it is true that selecting a good product require a considerable amount of time in terms of its features and utilities. Thanks to reviews of other buyers, people do not need to devote their precious time to this action repeatedly. Secondly, the fact that human beings use the same products give them an opportunity to make new friends. In a modern society where people hardly talk to each other, a popular product could be an association between two people as it is a topic that they are both interested in. As a result, a new friendship would be developed afterwards.
In conclusion, I believe that the inclination of people copying from each other is clearly prevalent in fashion clothes and consumer goods.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-14 | Emilycsnoopy | 89 | view |
2019-09-24 | Hendra | 61 | view |
2018-12-03 | Vishal Gangore | 56 | view |
2018-07-12 | aTrueRamones | 73 | view |
2018-07-08 | doremonvip123 | 89 | view |
- The graph below shows consumers' average annual expenditure on cell phone, national andinternational fixed-line and services in America between 2001 and 2010. 67
- The graph below shows consumers' average annual expenditure on cell phone, national andinternational fixed-line and services in America between 2001 and 2010. 67
- The chart shows the annual GDP growth rates in 3 countries from 2007 to 2010 87
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 61
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year2010. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 843, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iendship would be developed afterwards. In conclusion, I believe that the inclin...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, thus, well, as to, for example, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, first of all, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1543.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12624584718 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78284371799 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581395348837 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.7572365636 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.214285714 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5 7.06120827912 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221983428581 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0752632495141 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.055676746831 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141312404106 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385773189309 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.