The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010
The two diagrams illustrate changes of the road system connected to the hospital in a city from 2007 to 2010.
Overall, the most significant modification to the road system was the construction of new roundabouts. It is also noticeable that a new public car park was established to the east of the health center.
In 2007, a ring road surrounded the medical institution, which was directly linked to the city street through hospital RD. There were two lines of bus stops on each side of the hospital road, together with car parking place for the hospital’s employees and the public on the left side. Meanwhile, there was not any facilities on the other side of the hospital rd.
In 2010, the road system was renovated with two roundabouts at the entrance and the exit of the hospital road, forcing six bus stops to be demolished. However, a new bus station was constructed on the to the south – west of the hospital. This bus shelter could be accessed via two small paths. The car park to the south east of the medical center still remained unchanged, but it was for private use only. Patients, as well as their relatives had to use a new parking car, which was built on the left hand side of the hospital.
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 79
- The chart shows the annual GDP growth rates in 3 countries from 2007 to 2010 87
- The graph below shows consumers average annual expenditure on cell phone national and international fixed line and services in America between 2001 and 2010 69
- The tendency of human beings to copy one another is shown in the popularity of fashion clothes and consumer goods To what extent do you agree 90
- the chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, still, well, while, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1002.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61751152074 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68194055 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520737327189 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.0195528567 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.0909090909 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7272727273 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252433390465 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105962268595 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115674196242 0.0843802449381 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191174577515 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128015181784 0.0819641961636 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.