the pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year
2010.
The charts illustrate the proportion of spending on different goods and services of households in two
different countries in 2010.
Overall, it is clear that householders in both countries spent the largest proportion of their income on
Housing and Hood, while Healthcare was the service receiving the lowest share of expenditure.
The proportion of spending on Housing was highest in Malaysia, at 34% while Japanese families
allocated just 21% of their budget for this category. In terms of food, the figures for both nations were
similar, at 24% and 27% for Malaysia and Japan respectively.
Regarding the remaining categories, Transport accounted for exactly a fifth of total expenditure in
Japan, twice as much as the figure for Malaysia. Healthcare received the least amount of money in two
countries while the percentage of money spent on Other goods and services were quite significant, at
over a quarter in each country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-06-30 | doremonvip123 | 61 | view |
| 2018-06-30 | doremonvip123 | 56 | view |
- It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement.What sort of punishment should parents a 73
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.Why is this the case?What can be done about this problem? 89
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- Some people think international car-free days are an effective way of reducing air pollution; however,others think there are some other ways. 78
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 797.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 149.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34899328859 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49378814695 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90928566243 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.597315436242 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.9541316015 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.833333333 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8333333333 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 11.0 3.83414634146 287% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122856224051 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0635249556519 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0425487498238 0.0843802449381 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0459364686538 0.15604864568 29% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0484031624262 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.