The chart shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in newport City Centre from 2003 to 2012.
The graph represents the variation noticed in the three main areas of crime in the centre of new port city from 2003 to 2012.
To start with, it was 3400 incidents of burglary in 2003 and 3750 in 2004. Fortunately, in the next 4 years it fell down dramatically and reached the minimum figure of 1100 incidents. However, it then grew up by 300 incidents and remained steady by 2012.
Car theft was a steady level of crime from 2003 to 2004 and got reduced in next 5 years from 2700 upto 2250.The number then increased to 2700 in 2012 ; as compared, robbery reached its peak in 2005, which was 900 cases and decreased back to 500 in 2008.In the following two years, the number of incidences rose to 700 and continued to stay at this level in 2012.
Overall, the rate of bulglary fell significantly, the level of robbery remained fairly constant, whereas car theft raised and had the biggest number of incidences in 2012
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-10-26 | Faril | 73 | view |
| 2018-06-29 | suman_preetkaur | 73 | view |
| 2018-01-05 | hungnguyen012 | 67 | view |
- we are becoming increasingly dependent on computers. they are used in business comma hospitals, crime detection and even to fly planes. what things will they be used for in future? is this dependence on computer a good thing or should we be more suspiciou 61
- should there be minimum school going age or should students and their parents are free to decide when they join School. to what extent do you agree or disagree. 84
- Nowadays, people throw away old things and adapt new things. Do this disadvantages of throwaway society outway anypossible economic disadvantage. 84
- The table below shows the sales at small restaurant in Downtown business district. summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 100
- the three Pie Charts below shows the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 46, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...raph represents the variation noticed in the three main areas of crime in the cen...
^^
Line 5, column 109, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...ced in next 5 years from 2700 upto 2250.The number then increased to 2700 in 2012 ;...
^^^
Line 5, column 120, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
... 5 years from 2700 upto 2250.The number then increased to 2700 in 2012 ; as compared...
^^^^
Line 5, column 254, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...cases and decreased back to 500 in 2008.In the following two years, the number of ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, then, whereas, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 760.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.57831325301 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48308848481 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584337349398 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 207.0 283.868780488 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 99.8693591092 43.030603864 232% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 126.666666667 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6666666667 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194699489723 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0998350253096 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123718717081 0.0843802449381 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139308746202 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.134439674327 0.0819641961636 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 77.91 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.58 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.