The chart shows components of GDP in the UK from 1992 to 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The chart shows components of GDP in the UK from 1992 to 2000.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The chart depicts the GDP from IT and Service Industry of the UK from the year 1992 to 2000. It is measured in percentage.
Overall, it can be seen that GDP of both IT indsutry and Service industry has increased in the following years but IT industry shows a
enormous growth in the years 1998 and 2000.

At the beginning of the period, in 1992, GDP for Service Industry and IT industry was 4% and 6% repectively. Over the next four years,
the level became more similar, with both components standing between 6 and just over 8. IT was still higher overall, though it dropped slightly(just over 8%
to almost 8%) from 1994 to 1996.

However, over the following four years, the pattern of the two components were noticeably different. The percentage of IT industry shooted from almost 8% to 12% in 1996
however, Service industry had only a slight increase of just below 8% in 1996. The percentage of GDP for IT industry sharply increased to nearly 15% in 2000 and Service
industry had a slight increase to just over 8%.

Votes
Average: 7.1 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-11-04 khanhkhanhlhp view
2024-11-04 khanhkhanhlhp view
2024-11-04 khanhkhanhlhp view
2024-11-04 khanhkhanhlhp view
2024-11-04 khanhkhanhlhp 89 view
Essays by user deepak krishnamurthy :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 134, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...e following years but IT industry shows a enormous growth in the years 1998 and ...
^
Line 5, column 135, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...% repectively. Over the next four years, the level became more similar, with both...
^^^
Line 6, column 156, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., though it dropped slightlyjust over 8% to almost 8% from 1994 to 1996. Howev...
^^^
Line 10, column 169, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...reased to nearly 15% in 2000 and Service industry had a slight increase to just o...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, still

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 849.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66483516484 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5516107275 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489010989011 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4708831581 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.3333333333 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.55555555556 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 9.0 3.83414634146 235% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143170663511 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0721764277943 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0879763156163 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.073655007985 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0761218671589 0.0819641961636 93% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.14 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.