The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013.
The bar chart below illustrates that the habitat of eating in fast food restaurants in the USA between 2003 and 2013.
It is explicit that a trend of eating fast food altered quite closely resemble among frequencies.
Firstly, the “every day” item achieved the lowest scales proximately 4% in 2003 and 2.5% in both 2006 and 2013. In particular, there was also a frequency obtained lightly higher than “every day” item that was “never” item around 5% in 2003 and again the same with 4% in both 2006 and 2013.
Secondly, two frequencies had no large discrepancy which were “several times a week” and “a few times a year”. To be more precise, it figured out 17% in 2013, 16% in 2013 and the highest of this item belonged to 2006 with 20%. At the same time, in “a few times a year” item was under 15% in 2013 but acquired the same 15% in 2006 and 2013.
Thirdly, the biggest frequencies were “once a week” and “once or twice a month”. Specifically, in 2006 the percentage indicated the number of people ate fast food once a week achieved the highest equivalent 33%. Similarly, 33% was also the surge scale which perceived the frequency “once or twice a month”.
- the charts below show the main reasons for study among students ot different age groups and the amount of support they received from emplyoers. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, andmak comparisons where relevant. 89
- the table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmers (for example working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children).To what extent do you agree or disagree?Give r 61
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people. Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages?Discuss both these views and give your own o 84
- fatherhood ought to be emphasized as much as motherhood. The idea that women are solely responsible for deciding whether or not to have leads on to the idea that thay are also responsible for briging the children up. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, similarly, so, third, thirdly, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1052.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03349282297 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00113300187 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540669856459 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 307.8 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.9148657808 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.2 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.3 5.23603664747 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157715812428 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0957468463465 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127161282681 0.0843802449381 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144142945671 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.152225522659 0.0819641961636 186% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.