The pie chart illustrates the frequency of eating at fast food restaurant among people in the USA in three different years (2003, 2006 and 2013).
Looking at the chart, it is clear that most of American eat fast food in moderation. In addition, the percentage of people who never ate or ate on a daily basis remained low in the given period.
In 2003 and 2006, the proportion of people who eating at fast food restaurant once a week were 31 % and 33 %, the highest figure in both two years. Additionally, the ratio of people consuming fast food one or twice a month were short by 1 % and 8 % respectively. Conversely, the lowest percentage of American in two years are belong to people never eating or eating every day.
A different picture happened after 7 years in 2013, when the most significant proportion of people ate at fast food restaurant once or twice a month instead of on a weekly basic, this figure reached a peak of 33 %. On the other hand, every day or never eaters' percentage remained the least at only 3 % and 4 % respectively.
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 67
- The chart below show the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 56
- The diagram below shows the multistage production of pears as canned fruits Write a report for a university lecturer the process below 56
- The chart below show the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 67
- Nowadays it is possible to move ocean creatures from their natural habitat at sea and have them relocated in amusement parks for the purpose of people s recreation Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages Explain your rea 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 327, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'belonged'.
Suggestion: belonged
...percentage of American in two years are belong to people never eating or eating every ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, if, look, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 860.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59893048128 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69664001325 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540106951872 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2357355238 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.5 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.375 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3179192847 0.215688989381 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149207403092 0.103423049105 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101928119518 0.0843802449381 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226719334065 0.15604864568 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0784460430106 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.97 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.