The chart shows the number of shops that closed and the number of new shops opening in a country from 2011 to 2018.
The line graph illustrates the number of shops that stopped their business compared to the newly-opened ones in a particular country from 2011 to 2018.
Overall, both closures and openings decreased in number, whereas there were significant fluctuations regarding shop shutdowns.
First, the proportion of shop openings was notably high at the beginning of the period, with nearly 8500 shops emerging in 2011, compared to approximately 6300 of closures in the same year. However, while shop shutdowns dropped slightly in the following year, the number of shops being introduced experienced a steep decline to nearly 4000. After that, the figures of both sectors witnessed insignificant changes during the next two years, until 2014 when the two numbers merely met at 6300. Moreover, there was a dramatic decrease in shop shutdowns in 2015, with a hard fall from 6500 to beneath 1000. Subsequently, the figure rose sharply afterward before undergoing a stable phase in the last two years. Shop openings had a similar trend with a decline from 6000 to 4000 in 2015, while this number remained steady prior to a trivial decrease of 1000 in the final year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-23 | nobitaa | 67 | view |
| 2024-07-23 | nobitaa | 67 | view |
| 2023-07-06 | yeonjun's mint chocolate | view | |
| 2023-07-06 | yeonjun's mint chocolate | view | |
| 2023-05-27 | Dangdang | 67 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014 84
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 92
- Nowadays many people choose to be self employed rather than to work for a company or organization Why might this be the case What could be the disadvantage of being self employed 84
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compariso 78
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years Summaries the information by selecting and reporting t 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, regarding, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 972.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17021276596 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70754085863 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622340425532 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.6853775503 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.5 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.380728023175 0.215688989381 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166946375812 0.103423049105 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108178217405 0.0843802449381 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.285768110147 0.15604864568 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0708133616676 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.