The chart shows the number of shops that closed and the number of new shops opening in a country from 2011 to 2018.
The given chart displays the number of shops that closed and the number of shops opening in a region in the period of 7 years from 2011 to 2018.
that both figures were in decline, though most noticeably the number of openings. After erratic trends for both categories, by the end of the period closures had become more common.
Regarding the number of shops opening in 2011, its figure started at about 8,500 and fell considerably to 4,000 in the next year. After three years, the number of retail outlets opening witnessed a slight rise to roughly 6,000 and returned to the same figure in 2012. From 2015 onward, there was no change in the number of shops opening and ended with the figure being recorded at 3,000 in the final year.
Concerning the quantity of closed shops, its figure started the lower period with 6,500 in 2011, after which saw a fluctuation ranging from 6,000 to 6,400 in the period of 3 years from 2012 to 2014. In 2015, the number of shops that were closed dipped to roughly 900, which was approximately 4 higher than the figure of shops opening in 2015 and its figure started to rebound to about 5,100 in the next year and ended with the figure being recorded at 5,200 in 2018.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-07-23 | nobitaa | 67 | view |
2024-07-23 | nobitaa | 67 | view |
2023-07-06 | yeonjun's mint chocolate | view | |
2023-07-06 | yeonjun's mint chocolate | view | |
2023-05-27 | Dangdang | 67 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the popularity of well known Instagram accounts in 2018 and 2021 78
- Research shows that some activities are good for health and others are bad Despite knowing that millions of people engage in unhealthy activities What is the cause of this What can be done 84
- The table and charts detailed below give information about the police budget in 2017 and 2018 in on area of Britain The table illustrates where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed 84
- Some experts suggest that when a country is already rich any additional increase in economic wealth does not make its citizens happier To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some groups of people have benefited from modern communication technology However some think they do not have any benefit from this To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: That
...e period of 7 years from 2011 to 2018. that both figures were in decline, though mo...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
regarding
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 990.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54128440367 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.16360153877 2.65546596893 81% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.467889908257 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.956801217 43.030603864 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.75 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.25 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.125 5.23603664747 21% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.373053107387 0.215688989381 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.200166887584 0.103423049105 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.18316407922 0.0843802449381 217% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.297363363125 0.15604864568 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.214573338292 0.0819641961636 262% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.35 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.