The chart shows the number of shops that closed and the number of new shops opening in a country from 2011 to 2018.
The given chart displays the number of shops that closed and the number of shops opening in a region in the period of 7 years from 2011 to 2018.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that there were several grand openings of various shops in the first year, which then observed a modification that more shops are closed afterward.
Regarding the number of shops opening in 2011, its figure started at about 8,500 and fell considerably to 4,000 in the next year. After three years, the number of retail outlets opening witnessed a slight rise to roughly 6,000 and returned to the same figure in 2012. From 2015 onward, there was no change in the number of shops opening and ended with the figure being recorded at 3,000 in the final year.
Concerning the quantity of closed shops, its figure started the lower period with 6,500 in 2011, after which saw a fluctuation ranging from 6,000 to 6,400 in the period of 3 years from 2012 to 2014. In 2015, the number of shops that were closed dipped to roughly 900, which was approximately 4 higher than the figure of shops opening in 2015 and its figure started to rebound to about 5,100 in the next year and ended with the figure being recorded at 5,200 in 20188.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-23 | nobitaa | 67 | view |
| 2024-07-23 | nobitaa | 67 | view |
| 2023-07-06 | yeonjun's mint chocolate | view | |
| 2023-07-06 | yeonjun's mint chocolate | view | |
| 2023-05-27 | Dangdang | 67 | view |
- Some people have benefited from modern communications technology but some people have not benefited from it at all To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The table illustrates the proportion of monthly household income that five European countries spend on food and drink housing clothing and entertainment 67
- The table and charts detailed below give information about the police budget in 2017 and 2018 in on area of Britain The table illustrates where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed 73
- The chart shows requests for information at a tourist office in the United Kingdom from January to June 73
- The bar chart below shows the popularity of well known Instagram accounts in 2011 and 2021 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, regarding, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1015.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.592760181 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.225462468 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.470588235294 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.1511226478 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.0 112.824112599 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.5714285714 22.9334400587 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.57142857143 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.406539630234 0.215688989381 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.242184900872 0.103423049105 234% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.170670793541 0.0843802449381 202% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.331399619339 0.15604864568 212% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.181164909156 0.0819641961636 221% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.39 61.2550243902 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.