the chart shows the proportion of renewable energy in total energy supply in r different countries from 1997 to 2010
The chart illustrates how the amount of renewable energy in total energy supply was used in 4 countries from 1997 to 2010.
It is clear that, the percentage of renewable sources in Australia fall down through the given period, the opposite trend occurred to Sweden with the number of energy rose constantly and the same pattern could be seen in Iceland. Over the above-mentioned tendency, the number of Turkey witnessed an upward trend.
In 1997, almost 50% of energy was generated from renewable energy came from Iceland, furthermore, nearly 40% was accounted for Turkey. But only nearly 10% energy supply was from both Australia and Sweden. In the next period, the number of Iceland and Sweden kept increasing steadily to under slightly 10% and 60% for Sweden and Iceland respectively in 2000, in the rest of the given period, the number of Sweden nearly hit 10% and Australia reached its peak at 70% in 2010.
Regarding Australia, its figure decreased lightly to nearly 5% in 2010. While the number of Turkey went up and down throughout the period, it went up above 40% in 2000 and then, dropped down to almost 30% in 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-05-16 | firstlee192 | 73 | view |
- table 11
- Some students take one year off between finishing school and going to the university in order to travel or to work Do you think advantages outweigh disadvantages 64
- the chart shows the proportion of renewable energy in total energy supply in 4 countries from 1997 to 2010 73
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities 56
- Some students take one year off between finishing school and going to university in order 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 314, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er of Turkey witnessed an upward trend. In 1997, almost 50% of energy was genera...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, regarding, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 936.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82474226804 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51772333884 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530927835052 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.7659072506 43.030603864 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292267108226 0.215688989381 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156614245226 0.103423049105 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.191247254716 0.0843802449381 227% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229382070396 0.15604864568 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.224859283549 0.0819641961636 274% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.