The chart shows the results of surveys in one African country asking teenagers the main reasons for using their phones between 2016 and 2019.
The charts give information of four major reasons for usage of phones by teenagers in a nation in Africa from 2016 to 2019.
It is clear that most respondents said they used their phones for social networking, email and digital camera were used significantly less than social networking, and phone calls were the least popular purpose.
This African country's teenagers made use of their phone mostly for keeping in touch on social networking sites and this trend grew stronger toward the end of the 4-year period. In detail, in 2016 half of them utilized their phones to socialized on the Internet, and despite a mild drop of 2%, this number had reached 56% by 2019.
Email and digital camera had the opposite trends because in 2016 it was 25% for the former and 15% for the latter. However, by the end of the period email had witnessed a decline of 6% while use of digital cameras had increased by 5%. Lastly, the reason of making phone calls started in 2016 with 10% and had halved that figure by 2019.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-21 | Phuong1810 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | Phạm Gia Bảo | view | |
| 2023-08-02 | taman150507 | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-25 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 84 | view |
| 2023-06-21 | drikbest | 67 | view |
- Some people think that the news media nowadays have influenced people s lives in negative ways To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socializing online to meeting one another in person Why do you think this is the case What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person 84
- The chart shows the results of surveys in one African country asking teenagers the main reasons for using their phones between 2016 and 2019 92
- Some people think that the news media nowadays have influenced people s lives in negative ways To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport Why is it not popular in many places How can its popularity be increased 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, lastly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 835.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66480446927 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30985151055 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575418994413 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.3216919502 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.285714286 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5714285714 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.28571428571 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30547241949 0.215688989381 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14496656894 0.103423049105 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0709572433487 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192432546591 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0589863435512 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.