The line charts illustrate the unemployment trend in 2012 for rural and urban areas of Australia.
Overall, the percentage rate of unemployment is fluctuating throughout all the quarter for both the regions, rural and urban, but the unemployment rate increased in the urban areas whereas it decreased for rural areas. Both regions observed a significant difference in the percentage, however, at the end of the year, both end up with the same unemployed portion of the population.
Rural areas noticed almost 6.5% unemployed population, which is more than three times the unemployment rate than urban areas at the starting of the year. Throughout the first two quarters, it keeps declining and went bellow 5%. But in the second half of the year, it rose and fall a few times and closed at 5% by the end of 2012.
In contrast to the rural area, Urban areas experienced 98% employment at the starting point, but unemployment climbed up progressively over the first half the year, on the contrary of that trend, it dropped rapidly in the third quarter and reached back 2% of unemployment. However, the number of the unemployed population started going upwards till the completion of the year and rose almost 250% from the starting unemployment rate.
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- Plastic bags bottles and plastic packaging are bad for the environment What damage does plastic do to the environment What can be done by governments and individuals to solve this problem 78
- The graphs below show the enrolments of overseas students and local students in Australian universities over a ten year period 67
- Your have just read an article in a national newspaper which claims that town centers in your country all look very similar to each other You don t fully agree with this opinion Writer a letter to the editor of the newspaper In your letter say which point 78
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, third, whereas, in contrast, in contrast to, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 3.97073170732 353% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1050.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04807692308 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87556271828 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519230769231 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.9858854902 43.030603864 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.25 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.625 5.23603664747 222% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133277321819 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0711121010134 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469043790856 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105281590002 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0409483588364 0.0819641961636 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.