The bar chart compares the number of people going to sports centers, theme parks, and cinemas, and the table gives data about admission fees in these places in 2009.
It is clear that cinemas were by far the most popular entertainment destination and the tickets for football events were more expensive than that of other activities.
According to the chart, in 2009, cinemas welcomed around 1050 thousand visitors, which was fivefold the number of sports viewers (about 150 thousand people). There were 350000 people visiting theme parks in 2009, which almost doubled the figure for sports attendants.
In terms of the admission price, 3 football games named AFL, NRL, and NRU cost $75, $73, and $71 for each person and $298, $290, and $280 for 4 family members. The tickets in cinemas only cost a person $15 and a family $55, almost 4 and 5 times lower compared to that of football games. The ticket fee for visitors to theme parks, basketball game, and cricket game was $70, $34 and $24 per person and $210, $135, and $80 per family respectively.
- The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children s sports between 2008 and 2014 The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period 78
- The diagrams below show the design for a wave energy machine and its location Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years 67
- The graph below shows how money was spent on different forms of entertainment over a five years period 73
- Nowadays more and more people decide to have children later in their life What are the reasons What are the effects on society and family life 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 167, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...admission fees in these places in 2009. It is clear that cinemas were by far the...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 842.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.65193370166 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43897466524 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596685082873 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 7.0 0.482926829268 1449% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 19.8833331908 43.030603864 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 120.285714286 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8571428571 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.285714285714 5.23603664747 5% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0804251497052 0.215688989381 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0383641663519 0.103423049105 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0375970612612 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0541997299086 0.15604864568 35% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0367723774543 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.