The bar chart illustrates the enrolments of girls per 100 boys in different educational levels in developing and developed countries recorded in 1990 and 1998.
Overall, the number of girls per 100 boys fluctuated throughout the whole survey. Besides, it is obvious that in developed countries, girls were more allowed to get into educational institutions than those were in developing ones.
In 1990, among developing countries, primary school accounted for the highest figure, with around 83 girls enrolled. The figure declined to 72 in the secondary level of study and continued to decrease to 66 in tertiary education. By contrast, there was a slight rise among developed countries’ girls’ enrolments. Starting at properly 95 girl students at primary education, the figure increased to 98 and finally peaked at approximately 105 students in tertiary level.
In 1998, all the former figures recorded to slightly surge. In developing nations, the highest number was 87 girls enrolled in primary education and the lowest was 66 while they were 66 in tertiary level and 83 respectively, In developed countries, the lowest number was 96 students enrolled in primary schools and the highest one were 112 compared to those were 95 and 102.
- The table below shows the sales made by a coffee shop in an office building on a typical weekday 78
- Some people store personal and private information online including banking contacts and addresses Is it a positive or negative trend 78
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities 89
- Most people have forgotten the meaning behind traditional or religious festivals during festival periods peoplenowadays only want to enjoy themselves To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion Give reasons for your answer and include any re 67
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their wast 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, if, second, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1046.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28282828283 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90538835647 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 313.2 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.7956544666 43.030603864 165% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.222222222 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267235274588 0.215688989381 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120738689058 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108778104122 0.0843802449381 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19443123957 0.15604864568 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0930247808438 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.