The pie charts compare two separate years, 1991 and 2000 in term of the proportion of several main reasons to use public library in Britain.
It is clear that the rate of people spending their time in to borrow or return books was the most popular over the period shown. Overall, it is noticeable that the percentage of people obtaining information in 2000 was double the figure for in 1991.
The figures for people who visited the public library in order to borrow or return books and read newspapers or magazines tend to be fairly similar fell by 10% from 1991 to 2000. However, in 2000, the rate of British people studying at the public library dramatically dropped by 8% to 2%.
On the other hand, the percentage of British who obtained information in 2000 at the library was twice times as popular as that of those in 1991 and reached 20%. At that time, there was 18% of a new category borrow or return videos in the chart.
- Some people think that it is best to live in a horizontal city while others think of a vertical city. Discuss both view and give your opinion. 56
- The table shows the proportions of pupils attending four secondary school types between 2000 and 2009. 56
- Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds. Do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 73
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 61
- Writing task 1: Internet users as percentage of population. 41
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 765.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.52662721893 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35612950437 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550295857988 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 230.4 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.5379382476 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.285714286 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1428571429 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.28571428571 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.364163785807 0.215688989381 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.167640011561 0.103423049105 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111582678342 0.0843802449381 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227573957374 0.15604864568 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109349746286 0.0819641961636 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.29 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.